Such An Issue Stirs Up Moral And Religious Beliefs; Essays

Such an issue works up good and strict convictions; convictions that are in opposition to what America should accept. Be that as it may, such a discussion has been clear in the American commercial center of thoughts before with the disallowance of liquor in the 1920's. With the illicitness of liquor the mafia could produce alcohol and in this way had impressive authority over those who needed their substance and administration. The job that the mafia played in the 1920's has changed into the corner street pharmacists what's more, sedate cartel of the 1990's. The legitimization that authorized liquor under Amendment 21 out of 1933 ought to likewise legitimize sedates in 1996. With the sanctioning of medications a lessening in passings identified with sedate arrangements would happen and furthermore the cost would decrease since greater organizations could deliver drugs at a less expensive cost. In this manner, lessening wrongdoings that are resolved to help a medication propensity. Another medication that has assumed a significant job in American culture is nicotine. For many years, cigarettes have been a well known legitimate medication inside the United States. Just through legitimization what's more, instruction has the prominence and the utilization of cigarettes declined inside the previous ten years. Truly, the real outcomes of utilizing illegal medications is considerably less than of utilizing drugs like liquor or cigarettes and the outcomes will be reduced. Illegal medications can and will be made more secure than they are in the current framework. In making examinations, the best is to take a gander at how nations are working that have less authorization on drugs and what the measurements were after medications were decriminalized. Inside the most recent thirty years numerous gatherings have their endeavors. The utilization of medications is a harmless wrongdoing much like homosexuality. Gay people have battled for a lot of opportunity that depends on their essential human rights; the privilege to settle on choices and act uninhibitedly dependent on what is ensured under the Constitution, insofar as any other person isn't influenced. Monetarily, the creation of medications in the United States would advantage the money related prosperity of the American government and individuals. Expenses ought to promptly be set on drugs in this way bringing about a critical increment in government salary. The more cash that administration gets is more cash that they can put towards the training of how medications impact the human psyche and body. Preclusion breeds slight for law?enforcement; the organization that should hold the most noteworthy regard of the American society. Cash spent on disallowance is a staggering figure that isn't required and is clearly achieving pretty much nothing. Those who need to be constrained by a substance ought to have each privilege to do as such, on the grounds that this privilege has equivalent ward as some other human right that has risen up out of the ocean of abuse and oppressed opportunities. The passings bringing about the gaining of liquor have everything except vanished. At the point when all non?medical dealings in liquor were restricted in the United States in 1919, the results were fundamentally the same as the present medication exchange. Liquor quality was prepared illegally; shippers were thought of lawbreakers and carried on thusly; assurance rackets, pay-offs furthermore, group fighting composed wrongdoing in the United States. (Boaz, p.118) The authorization spending rose from $7 million in 1921 to $15 million of every 1930, $108 million out of 1988 dollars. In 1926, the Senate Judiciary Committee delivered a 1,650-page report assessing authorization endeavors and proposing changes. In 1927, the Bureau of Prohibition was made to smooth out authorization endeavors, and specialists were brought under common help security to kill defilement and improve polished methodology. In that equivalent year, President Hoover selected a blue-strip commission to assess requirement endeavors and suggest changes. After three years Forbiddance was finished and liquor was legalized.(Boaz, pps.49?50) Promptly, the peddler quit going around the boulevards providing illegal stash. Individuals quit stressing over lushes robbing them in the lanes or breaking into their lofts to get assets to purchase a 16 ounces of wine. We currently manage liquor maltreatment as a clinical issue. Let us manage the medication issue similarly. Let us do whatever it takes not to rehash the mix-ups of the past by proceeding to raise a war that is completely unnecessary.(Boaz, p.120) The nullification of liquor disallowance gives the ideal relationship. Cancelation didn't end alcoholismas without a doubt Prohibition didn't - yet it solved a significant number of the issues made by Prohibition, for example, debasement, murder, and harmed alcohol.(Boaz, p.50) We can anticipate no more and no less from medicate sanctioning today. US has done whatever it takes not to boycott the utilization of tobacco on cigarette smoking is one of America's most risky medication propensities. Nicotine, the dynamic fixing in tobacco, is exceedingly toxic. At the point when segregated and taken orally, it can get passing merely minutes. Cigarette tobacco contains about 1.5 percent

Compare Chinese and American national cybersecurity policies (or more Term Paper

Look at Chinese and American national cybersecurity approaches (or more nations)) - Term Paper Example The motivation behind this investigation is to think about the adequacy of the national digital security arrangements that have been applied in China and America and to give feasible answers for the shortcomings in these strategies. By drawing from a wide scope of hypothetical and factual assets, it will be conceivable to look at the exhibition of the digital security strategies in these nations. A basic examination of the materials will give a satisfactory ground to give useful answers for that will assist the administration with improving digital security approaches in their nations. Chinese versus American National Cyber Security Introduction Cyber security is a term that rose following the improvement of an information driven world that is driven by the web and online nearness. As the worldwide patterns request greater commitment of the web and all business activities become driven by this innovation, the requirement for information security has ascended because of the presence o f hacking and data fraud as the man at the center accesses delicate data during its transmission. Indeed, even today, numerous associations and residents keep on being survivors of casualties of cybercrime sending an alert to the legislature to actualize online security to guarantee wellbeing of delicate business exchanges. China and America are among the nations that have concentrated on the digital security to ensure wellbeing of data in online business. The reason for this paper is to make a correlation between the America digital security arrangements with those that have been conveyed in China. To draw this correlation, the approaches applied in every nation will be broke down and their effect on information security will be assessed. An auxiliary research will be led from a wide scope of materials including government reports and approved research attempts to assemble valid data. The data so got will be identified with the subject point to shape a premise of the ends. From the exploration, it will be conceivable to give proposals to elective systems that can be utilized to expand digital security and assurance wellbeing of data sent over the systems. This will give a generous stage to the improvement of information security strategies in China and America, yet additionally across different countries that have been hit with the blow of cybercrime in the business condition. Foundation of Cybercrime and Cyber-Security Cybercrime alludes to the utilization of programming, fish-sends or impossible to miss malware to acquire client data wrongfully during an information transmission process. With the present increment in online fiscal exchanges, the digital hoodlums have vested more endeavors to acquire data from residents and business association. For example, when an online financier takes care of their qualifications into the online records, it is feasible for programmers to get this data and use it to make illicit exchanges. As indicated by United States De partment of Crime and Justice, (2013) around 5 million Americans are hacked each year and their personality data is utilized and at any rate $50 million dollars is lost to digital lawbreakers. In China, Anderson reports that in China, more than 700,000 web clients fall survivor of cybercrime each without their insight and over $874 million is lost to fraudsters. Notwithstanding the basic endeavors that have been locked in to handle the issue, cybercrime keeps on being a major issue in numerous nations. The 2013 cybercrime report introduced by Sophos new

5 Benefits of Soft Credit Check Loans

5 Benefits of Soft Credit Check Loans 5 Benefits of Soft Credit Check Loans 5 Benefits of Soft Credit Check LoansWith a soft credit check loan, youre likely to see lower rates than you would with a no credit check loanâ€"and it might even help your credit score!???????If you have bad credit, then you’re probably familiar with no credit check loans. These are a type of bad credit loan that doesn’t perform any sort of credit check when you apply. The most common kinds of no credit check loans include payday loans, title loans, and cash advances.But there’s another kind of bad credit loan you should know: Soft credit check loans. This is a category that includes many of the bad credit installment loans available to folks whose low scores lock them out from traditional lenders.There are many benefits to soft credit check loans, some of which they share with no credit check loans, but also some that make them an improvement on their no credit check cousins. If you have bad credit and need money to cover a surprise expense, heres what you need to know.1. The y’re easy and fast!If you’ve ever applied for a personal loan from a bank or other traditional lender, you know that the process is not speedy. Once you’ve entered in all your informationâ€"and they’ll ask for a lot itâ€"you’ll still have to wait days before you receive a decision.Soft credit check loans, on the other hand, are easy to apply for. While performing a soft credit checkâ€"and sometimes an income verificationâ€"requires more information than a no credit check application, it’s still something that you can complete very quickly.And once you submit your application, you’re likely to get a decision in a matter of minutes or hours, not days. When you’re dealing with something like an unexpected car repair or medical bill, this sort of easy application lets you get back to focusing on what really matters.And if you’re approved, you’ll get your funds quickly. Sometimes you can even receive your funds the same day, but oftentimes you’ll receive them by the next business day. Still, that’s much faster than traditional lenders and gets you the money you need when you need it: Now.2. Applying won’t affect your credit.When you apply for a traditional personal loan, the lender is going to run a hard check on your credit. This returns them a full copy of your credit report and lets them do a deep dive on your history as a borrower. Hard checks are recorded on your report and they’ll temporarily lower your score.Soft credit checks, on the other hand, are not recorded on your credit report and do not affect your score. This is because they return less information than a hard check, giving lenders a broad overview of your credit history instead of a comprehensive reporting.With traditional loans, getting your application denied is doubly frustrating: Not only do you not get the money you need, but your score has been lowered. With soft credit check loans, however, there is no downside. Even if your application for credit is denied, your score won’t take a hit!3. They come with lower rates.Soft credit check loans are still a type of bad credit loan, so their rates are going to be higher than standard personal loans. There’s really no way around it. Borrowers with bad credit default at higher rates, so these lenders have to charge higher interest rates in return to protect against potential loss.But since soft credit check loans do their due diligence on applicants and turn down borrowers who can’t afford to repay (more on why that’s a good thing in the next section), their default rates are naturally lower than no credit check lenders.What this means for you is simple: Soft credit check lenders often charge lower rates than no credit check lenders! Lower rates mean that you save money over the life of the loan, and they also lower your risk of getting trapped in an ongoing cycle of debt.4. They check your ability to repay.When you take out a loanâ€"no matter if its an online loan or one from a brick-and-mor tar institutionâ€"you want to be able to pay it back. Otherwise, you’ll end up with negative marks on your score and a debt collector hounding you for payments. You could even end up in court with your wages getting garnished!With no credit check loans, the likelihood of this happening is much higher because the lender doesn’t do anything to check whether or not you can afford the loan you’re trying to borrow.In many cases, no credit check lenders stand to make more money from their customers not paying their loans off the first time. When borrowers are forced to roll over their loan or take out another loan immediately after paying off their old one, that means more money for the lender.But with soft credit check loans, lenders will not loan money to someone that they estimate can’t afford the loan. This is why these loans are less likely to trap borrowers in an ongoing cycle of debt: Because these lenders care about their customers paying off their loan the first time, not the fifth.5. Some can help your credit.With a no credit check loan, the only way you’re going to see your credit score affected is if you default on the loan and it ends up as a collections account. In other words, the only way for your score to go with a loan like this is down.But some soft credit check lenders (including OppLoans) actually report payment information to the credit bureaus that create your credit reports. This means that on-time payments will go on your report and could help improve your score.Your payment history is the most important part of your credit score, making up 35 percent of your total. As such, good payment history is critical to maintaining a  good credit score or fixing a lousy one. And these soft credit check loans give you the opportunity to build better credit.Soft credit check loans aren’t a silver bullet by any means. But the right loan can be a great tool to help you address a financial shortfall. And the best soft credit check loans can ev en help you to start building a brighter financial future.To learn more about improving your credit and your financial outlook, check out  these other posts and articles from OppLoans:How to Raise Your Credit Score by 100 PointsBuilding Your Financial Life: Budgeting for BeginnersSave More Money with These 40 Expert Tips10 Good Money Habits to Make Your Friends JealousDo you have a personal finance question youd like us to answer? Let us know! You can find us  on  Facebook  and  Twitter.  |Instagram

How the Louisana Purchase Was Aganist the Constitution...

Through the Louisiana Purchase a lot of problems with how Thomas Jefferson dealt with the Constitution can be found. Jefferson was the third president of the United States and the leader of the Democratic-Republican Party. Even though he believes in a strict interpretation of the Constitution his actions during the Louisiana Purchase violates this avowed Constitutional principle of his and it also went against his principal of low government spending. Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution. In â€Å"Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank† Jefferson says, â€Å"all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦show more content†¦Other than this there was nothing about the purchase of new territory in the Constitution. Jefferson had to use implied powers again to justify the purchase. Jefferson in his second inaugural addre ss said, â€Å"I know that the acquisition of Louisiana had been disapproved by some from a candid apprehension that the enlargement of our territory would endanger its union. But who can limit the extent to which the federative principle may operate effectively?† Jefferson basically said that there are some cases in which to keep the federal government operating effectively some rules need to be broken when necessary. He abuses the fact that the Constitution isn’t clear about the purchase of new lands to buy Louisiana and doing so he goes against his strict view of the Constitution. There is one last major way that Jefferson violates his Constitutional Principals, and that is by going against his principal of low government spending. Jefferson, in the Jeffersonian Cyclopedia, wrote, â€Å"I am for a government rigorously frugal and simple, applying all the possible savings of the public revenue to the discharge of the national debt.† Jefferson believed in spend ing as little money as possible to keep the national debt low. For the most part he keeps true to this, but the Louisiana Purchase shows once again how he goes against his principals. In transcription of the Louisiana Purchase it says, â€Å"The Government

The Addiction Of Methamphetamine Among Juvenile Essay

Introduction The addiction of methamphetamine amongst juvenile’s and adults has reached epidemic proportions that affect the individual, families and communities. Methamphetamine abuse has crossed all social economic boundaries that have negatively impacted law enforcement, social and clinical services. According to Anglin, Burke, Perrochet, Stamper and Dawud-Noursi (2000), methamphetamine, also known as meth, crystal, or speed, is a substance that affects the central nervous system creating a stimulant effect that can be injected, smoked, snorted, or ingested orally. Individuals who use meth for an extensive period of time tend to become addicted and will likely need to continue to use meth at high levels for its effects to continue to provide the euphoric symptoms and sensations. Anglin, et al, also describe methamphetamine as a derivative of amphetamine, this form of amphetamine was often used for medication purposes in the 1950’s and 1960’s to treat symptoms of depres sion and obesity. Durell, Kroutil, Crits-Christoph, Barchha, and Van Brunt (2008), also stated that illicit methamphetamine use is a public health concern in the United States with an increase use among teens and young adults in the 1990s. The Mental Health Services Administration conducted a national survey on meth use in the United States and found that currently as least a half a million of Americans used or have used methamphetamine. Meth use is an epidemic that is slowly becoming a destructiveShow MoreRelatedEssay Consequences of Substance Abuse at a Young Age899 Words   |  4 PagesYoung people are using mood-changing substances at an increasingly younger age. Persistent substance abuse among youth is often accompanied by a plethora of problems, including school related hardships, health-related problems, poor family relationships, mental health issues, and run-ins with the justice system. There are also significant consequences involving the community, and society in gen eral. Studies show drug use at a young age increases the desire to abuse as you get older. Society looksRead MoreJuvenile Offenders And Juvenile Delinquency1610 Words   |  7 PagesJuvenile delinquency, also known as juvenile offending, is participation in illegal behavior by minors8. A juvenile delinquent in the United States is a person who is typically under the age of 17 and commits an act that otherwise would have been charged as a crime if they were an adult. Depending on the type and severity of the offense committed, it is possible for persons under 18 to be charged and tried as adults. Juvenile crimes can range from status offenses (such as underage smoking), toRead Moreaddiction concept writing1340 Words   |  6 PagesThe War on Addiction Cocaine, heroin, methamphetamines, alcohol, opium, tobacco, hypnotics, just to name a few. Addiction is a chronic disease that affects the chemicals in the brain. It dysfunctions the circuits in the brain that deal with memory, reward, sex, motivation, behavior, relationships and emotions all mostly resulting in substance use or other behaviors to fulfill those circuit rewards. This world is in a current addiction epidemic on drugs. Let’s try to understand addiction to make itRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Banned?1580 Words   |  7 Pagesdrugs. Ice the drug of choice , Senate inquiry hears. The Sydney morning herald reports on the increase of the drug ‘ice’. Amongst youths it is at its greatest increase as juveniles are able to get the drug for a cheaper price to alcohol and more easily. With about 2 per cent of Australians consuming the methamphetamine drug which is commonly known as ice, which has been reported as to be dropping in price and increasing in quality and the strength of the drug. The NSW police force had reportedRead MoreThe Impact of Drugs on Society3805 Words   |  16 Pagesgovernment resources and, ultimately, the taxpayer. This effect is the most evident with methamphetamine. Clandestine methamphetamine production sites have been seriously injured or killed as a result of methamphetamine production. (www.usdoj.gov) (p.2). According to the DEA, the average cost to clean up a methamphetamine production laboratory is $1,900. Given that an average of 9,777 methamphetamine laboratory seizures were reported to NCLSS each year between 2002 and 2004, the economicRead More The Existence of Crime Culture Among Certain Social Groups Essay3545 Words   |  15 Pagesstandards, with no chance of succeeding in the future. The anti social structure of cities also affects the why a boy and or girl joins a gang. The formation of gangs in cities, and most recently in suburbs, is assisted by the same lack of community among parents. While almost half of high seniors used marijuana at least once, thirty-seven percent said they had used it in the past year, and twenty-three percent said they had used it in the previous month. Strain Theory, posits the disjuncture betweenRead MorePros And Cons Of Juvenile Drug Courts1589 Words   |  7 Pagesalso assumed that the quicker treatments began after the initial arrest, the less time an offender would spend in jail, where there is a more negative environment and where drug use could possibly continue. There is over 2,000 adult and about 500 juvenile drug courts in the United States today (Shaffer, 2011). There is also a family drug court where parents can go to seek help when they are in danger of losing custody of their child, because of drug abuse. Drug courts are different from traditionalRead MoreDrug Abuse8640 Words   |  35 Pagesnarcotic and psychoactive stimulants forms the core of most popular music videos. Parties in metropolitan cities today are not concluded without the customary party drugs. Available easily on the street, at rates not affected by inflation, drugs are among the most harmful items on any individual’s shopping list. In the following report, an attempt has been made to discuss the causes cure for drug abuse. This report is intended for all audiences. Acknowledgment Read MoreThe United States Prisons And Federal Prisons959 Words   |  4 Pagesover 60 percent of American prisons. The majority of them are in jail for drug offences such as marijuana, cocaine, crack, heroin, and methamphetamine. More than half of federal prisoners are incarcerated for drug crimes in 2010, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. That number has only just dipped below 50 percent in 2011. Despite more relaxed attitudes among the public at large toward non-violent offenses like marijuana use, the number of people in federal prison for drug offenses spikedRead MoreEssay on America Home of Incarceration1968 Words   |  8 PagesThis helps the states and counties with overcrowding and the cost of taking care of the inmate while incarcerated. The prisoner that is on house arrest is also made to pay restitution for the monitoring. (Johnson James) Rehabilitation programs are among one of the most popular ways of alternative sentencing. When a person is convicted of a felony or misdemeanor drug possession or a charge of being under the influence of a controlled substance (including alcohol), many times a judge will sentence them

Is America a Christian Nation Free Essays

â€Å"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. † Thomas Jefferson wrote those words to express the emotions of a nation that desired freedom, and to shake the foundation of the British Empire. However, this simple, but eloquent phrase has sparked one of the greatest debates in American history. We will write a custom essay sample on Is America a Christian Nation or any similar topic only for you Order Now Is America a Christian nation? One question has divided the nation and its politicians since the founding and forming of America. This fiery debate has sparked more controversy than any other debate in modern politics. When the facts are analyzed and examined it points to the side that America was not, and is not a Christian nation. It is not a Christian nation because the Founding Father’s ideas for this country were no meant to be entangled with a national religion. There are clear and precise arguments on both sides, but one must put aside all biases and see that America’s founders had no intention of making America into a nation that was centered on one religion. Through their own writings, letters, and actions the founders have shown that creating a government that protected the rights and liberties of the people was the primary and fundamental goal. The War for American Independence was not fought because the colonists wanted to separate from England, which already had a national religion, to create another nation based on a religion. It was fought in order to free themselves from the tyrannical monarchs that lived hundreds of miles away. In order to discover the solution to this debate the founding of this nation must be analyzed in detail. Furthermore, it is important to look at this history because this debate deals directly with the founding principles, rather than the evolution of American government. The first question that must be asked is why the founders would be opposed to a national religion (or Christian nation) if that is what they had before. For instance, one battle cry of the revolution was, â€Å"Give me liberty, or give me death! † It was not, give me religion or give me death, so it was clear to see that the people in America were not revolting because they felt their freedom of religion was in danger. It was an important part f their history though. As a matter of fact, the fear of religious persecution was not far removed from their memories. The men that had come to America had witnessed firsthand the results of a corrupt national church. They had come from the Anglican Church, which was created solely because Henry VIII wanted to divorce his wife. Many came to the colonies of America because the corrupt church was challenging their beliefs and not allowing them to worship as they saw fit. These men and woman realized that having a national religion did not give more rights or promote religion, but simply corrupted it. The founders believed that religion should be left up to the people to carry out how they see fit, without interference from any type of government. Those who claim that America was a Christian nation often point to the phrase in the â€Å"Declaration of Independence† where Jefferson invokes the name of the â€Å"Creator. † Even though this seems like a valid point, the truth is that Jefferson and many of the other Founding Fathers were not Christians, but rather Deists. This worldview states that a higher power created the universe and all those in it, but then left it alone and does not care or pay attention to his creation. Jefferson may have been referring to god, but it was certainly not the Christian God of the Bible. Like many of the prominent statesmen of that day, Jefferson knew who he was addressing. In the colonies, the majority of people would be considered Christians. Whether or not Jefferson or the other founders believed in the Christian God, they knew they had to secure the support of the people. People, would certainly be more likely to follow a plan to take on the greatest empire in the world if they believed their cause was supported by God. Secondly, when supporters of the Christian nation idea point to the Declaration as proof they fail to realize something. The Declaration is not law. Nothing in the Declaration legally guides the way American government or its people function. Even though it set up the foundation for this new nation, it cannot be regarded as any type of legal document that would give evidence of a Christian based nation. However, even if someone were to look at the Declaration as proof, there are more misconceptions. The idea in the Declaration of a government that derives its power from the people is adically different from the theory of divine rights that is seen in the Christian kingdoms of the past. The founder’s idea of a government by and for the people completely rejects the idea of a government where man derives the right to maintain power from a divine being. Moreover, if the founders had wanted to remain in that type of society than they could have used much simpler terms, rather than using the confusing, vague terms such as â€Å"Creator. † Since the Declaration is not in fact a law, one must look at the actual document that guides the way American government is supposed to act, the Constitution. If the founders had intended to create a Christian nation, then it would follow that their laws would follow in that way. However, this is not the case. In reality, it could not be further from the truth. For example, in Article VI section 3 of the Constitution it states that will be no religious test for public office. If the founders intended for a national religion, then why not make influential, political figures be held to some religious standard? Once again, the evidence points to the founders trying to avoid the route of so many of the nations that came before them. In yet another attempt to make sure there was no national religion, the 1st Amendment to Constitution states that, â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. † Clearly, the founders knew that establishing a national religion would result in the persecution of any other religion or belief system. Also, the establishment clause has been interpreted to mean there is a wall of separation between church and state, according to the Supreme Court. Even though this â€Å"wall† is not in the Constitution, it is implied through the 1st Amendment. Finally, the laws and fundamental beliefs were based off the ideas of John Locke and Greek philosophers. The argument that states that common law and the natural rights of man came from any type of religious belief system cannot be used. Therefore, the foundation of this country was not based on Biblical (or any other religious) standards, when it came to the policies and functions of the US government. If the laws and history of the founders point to a rejection of national religion, what about how they lived out these policies? What did their actions and writings say about how they intended to run America? When one looks at the founder’s polices and laws, it is obvious that they never intended for America to have an established religion. Firstly, in 1779 Thomas Jefferson presented the â€Å"Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom† to an assembly in Virginia. This statute would greatly influence the 1st Amendment in that it was concerned with the corruption of national religion and the persecution of those who think differently. â€Å"Whereas, Almighty God hath created the mind free; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or [burdens] or by civil incapacitations tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness. Clearly, the founders were aware of the eminent dangers that would follow creating an establishment of religion. Moreover, this statute was supported by James Madison, who is considered to be the author of the Constitution, and a group of Baptists that had been largely persecuted when there was an established religion. Furthermore, before the C onstitution was ratified there was much debate over what type of government to have. â€Å"The Federalist Papers† were a series of essays defending the Constitution and a more powerful federal government than that of the Articles of Confederation. One of the main fears of the Federalists was the creation of factions. This meant groups, most likely political parties gaining control and causing a tyranny of the majority. Under the pseudonym â€Å"Publius† James Madison argued that even religious sects could become tyrannical when he wrote, â€Å"A religious sect may degenerate into a political faction in a part of the Confederacy; but the variety of sects dispersed over the entire face of it must secure the national councils against any danger from that source,† Obviously, this is an argument for a Union rather than a confederacy, but it clearly shows the founders fear of a national religion. They believed, like they had seen in the past that an established religion would be nothing more than a corrupt, political faction. Moreover, the most glaring, apparent proof that the founders did not want a national religion was when they were dealing with foreign nations. After the War for American Independence, the former colonies had to deal with the Barbary pirates themselves as they no longer had protection from England or France. Therefore a treaty was signed at Tripoli, in order to ensure peace and friendship between the two battling sides. This document was signed and ratified by President John Adams and was unanimously voted through by the Senate. Article 11 of the treaty states that, â€Å"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the part that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries. Even though this was a treaty it showed what the founders truly believed about the nation that they had created. Furthermore, according to Article VI section 2 of the Constitution all treaties made by Congress shall become the supreme law of the land. There is the idea that this article was merely added to please the Muslim nation, which is a valid point. However, bec ause it was a treaty it became law after it was ratified by the Senate. Why would the founders make such a bold statement that would become the supreme law of the land if they did not really mean it? It is apparent that the founders were clearly stating, in this treaty, what they had already considered to be true. The study of history is important because it allows people to learn from the mistakes and errors of those in the past. The founders were some of the most intelligent men that have ever walked this earth and were certainly scholars of history. Therefore, they saw the corruption and persecution that was brought upon by the establishments of national religions. In no way were the founders hostile towards Christianity, Judaism, Deism, or any other religious beliefs. If anything, when the arguments are analyzed the founders were trying to protect religions and peoples religious beliefs more than anything else. By not allowing the establishment of religion they ensured that, for example, Christianity would be handled by the different churches and denominations of that religion, and not by a unitary government figure. Through their actions, writings, and policies it was evidently clear that America was never meant to be a Christian nation. In order to maintain the principles of liberty, the founding fathers had to create a nation where religion could flourish without the flaws and corruptions that come with combining a source of power with religious belief. If they had not done this, history would have surely repeated itself and the corruption of the church and government would have been much greater. How to cite Is America a Christian Nation, Essay examples

Muckle-Wells Syndrome Market Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends And Forecast, 2013 2019 Essay Example

Muckle-Wells Syndrome Market Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends And Forecast, 2013 2019 Paper Muckle-Wells Syndrome Market Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends And Forecast, 2013 2019 Muckle-Wells Syndrome (MWS) is a rare, genetic autosomal disease which leads to urticaria, sensorineural deafness, and also leads to amyloidosis. The disease is mainly caused due to mutation of CIAS1 gene, that leads to increased production of interleukin 1B. Due to interaction of IL1B and skin receptors, the inflammation occurs, which leads to fever and rashes. The common symptoms include fevers, chills, deafness, arthritis, and recurrent urticaria.The episode of MWS usually lasts for around 48 hours. The disease belongs to a family of cryopyrin- associated periodic syndromes (CAPS), including 2 other diseases, caused by mutation of CIAS1 gene.Visit Complete Report Here: http://www.marketresearchreports.biz/analysis-details/muckle-wells-syndrome-market-global-industry-analysis-size-share-growth-trends-and-forecast-2013-2019 Muckle-Wells Syndrome can be diagnosed with the help of study of patient’s symptoms and medical evaluation. In addition, gene testing and NLRP3 mutation study also helps in diagnosis of the disease. Owing to extensive growth in genetic engineering, the market is expected to grow duringthe forecast period 2013 to 2019. The major treatments for MWS includes Rilonacept (for CAPS treatment), anakinra (IL-1 receptor antagonist) and Canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody. In addition to the existing treatments, some new treatments are under pipeline studies.The market of Muckle-Wells Syndrome is driven by factors such as, extensive RD activities, technological advancement in research and genetic sciences and growing concern about various genetic disorders. Extensive RD is one of the major factor, propelling the market growth. Considering the growth perspective, many pharmaceutical and biotechnological leaders are engaged in the development of medications and treatments for this disease. However, low epidemiology, lack of